Where do you stand? The floor is about to crumble and here it is you have found yourself.
The ground is shaking and neither of the occupants have made a move. Though, the I that is the host, that is, the I that which is the designee of this particular realm and is the product of its own imagination, remains and without a question is the holder of this area. The immutable aspect, for without it, no evidence is there to prove an existence of this realm.
A guest may enter the stage, but bear in mind when the ground shakes and the floor is crumbling, the best choice may be to exit before the ground that which sustains both perceivers goes to parish.
What is the foundation being referred to, that which holds both occupants?
That would have to be the conventional worldview as one knows it to be, for there to be both occupants.
The way things are headed, once its begun there is no stopping the mind from dilapidating the contents of this independent world.
Each and every time a principle is formed, the ground becomes more fragile, as if it were a walking egg shell.
That which speaks itself into existence, the more it learns to articulate its sense of being, the more it works to dismantle the surrounding conventions.
Relegate the mind to decision maker and the body becomes an icon, so the principle states.
By waking up to the mind, the body it has adopted and has become fresh, demands to be wielded in control, in a way that is of its own making; its own image.
Each principle that is formed restates a newly established level of control, a new piece of evidence that restates the claim over the new body. You are restating evidence of a belief that says, this body is mine.
What does reality look like, when it is spoken into existence and created in the likeness of its own image?
What does reality look like when looked at with fresh eyes, just what does that picture look like?
By asserting ownership you reaffirm your existence that which pronounces over the conventional world, the one this body and mind has woken up to.
Establish one principle and suddenly the ground becomes a walking eggshell. Raise one finger, glance one eye, whatever is presented incurs fragments.
It is a matter of asking the question, who is the I that recognizes such image or scene, who is the I that could perceive the image or scene being presented. To ask that question is to be released from the contents of the befallen frame.
To ask that question is to exercise that belief or sense of being, at the perception of anything the mind comes across. It is to learn to familiarize one’s favorable state of being until there is nothing left to coordinate but rather has been made a way of being.
So, the question has been learned to ask not what, but who. Now that awareness is a matter of asking who, no longer does the I exist, for if in any case it would respond to anything that is over emphasized.
So it goes, an image or scene is presented, the I that perceives recognition is befallen into the contents of the frame, the I that is learning to pronounce itself asks the question, who then is it that recognizes this image? Who would the I have to be in order to recognize such imagery? An answer is produced. The answer says, anything that the mind perceives or recognizes would have to be something that is emphasized or over pronounced, otherwise it wouldn’t recognize it at all.
What happens then? If whatever is presented to you cannot be recognized or made so subtle it ceases stimulation, what happens to the experience? How then does one have an experience?
A being who is independent and has been incorporated doesn’t need a separate and individual experience in order to exist and operate simultaneously in the physical world.
To experience something without emphasis is to be able to enjoy what it has to offer without being latched and absorbed into the contents of its frame as equal participants. To experience by adhering to over emphasis, implies being equal to or on the same plain field as the object that depends on your interaction or subduing.
Without either of those criteria means adhering to a different form of response.
A response that doesn’t require an exchange between object and subject that is representative of a dependent relationship, but instead a shared and collective body that is in favor of contribution.
No longer does the body become an attribute depended on objection, but instead subject to an incorporation whereby both responders or recipients are reduced to nothing. This way both contenders are employed to an equal, just and common goal, subject to the spirit of law and principle.
Object and subject have now been given an opportunity, a first of its kind to afford the office of administration whereby it is employed only to ask the necessary and appropriate question that which will serve the common goal.
The only task in the seat of administrator is to ask only the necessary questions that which is sustaining the current order of things, synonymous with belief or a conventional idea. The question in response to that is the answer that which will bring you to the next step of the goal.
To dismantle the sustaining order of things in everyday life is to not only further reinstate oneself as an institution, but to regain a clear sight of reality again, as things were before; what is an unaffected, untainted picture of reality.